Monday, July 17, 2006

Bush's Brain

Jonathan Chait: Is Bush Still Too Dumb to Be President? - Los Angeles Times: ". . .Oh, sure, a few of us have brought it up from time to time, but we have generally been dismissed out of hand as wacky Bush-haters. By 2004, the question had been turned around completely. Democrats had almost nothing to say about Bush's lack of intellect, while Republicans joyfully and repeatedly attacked John Kerry as an egghead. Anti-intellectualism was triumphant.

Yet it is now increasingly clear that Bush's status as non-rocket scientist is a serious problem. The problem is not his habit — savored by late-night comedians — of stumbling over multisyllabic words. It is his shocking lack of intellectual curiosity.

Ron Suskind's new book, 'The One Percent Doctrine,' paints a harrowing picture of Bush's intellectual limits. Bush, writes Suskind, 'is not much of a reader.' He prefers verbal briefings and often makes a horse-sense judgment based on how confident his briefer seems in what he's saying. In August 2001, the CIA was in a panic about an upcoming terrorist attack and drafted a report with the title, 'Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.' When a CIA staffer summed up the memo's contents in a face-to-face meeting with Bush, the president found the briefer insufficiently confident and dismissed him by saying, 'All right, you've covered your ass, now,' according to Suskind. That turned out to be a fairly disastrous judgment.

Bush loyalists like to dismiss Suskind's reporting, but it jibes with the picture that has emerged from other sources. L. Paul Bremer III's account of his tenure as head of Iraq's Coalition Provisional Authority depicts Bush as uninterested in the central questions of rebuilding and occupying the country. . ."

Uygur on the Head Chickenhawk

The Smirking Chimp: "Bill Kristol has never seen a war he didn't like. No, that's too soft. A war he didn't love and lust after. Here's a wolf in sheep's clothing pretending to be serious, sober minded analyst on television when in reality he is trying to get us sucked into horrific wars that other people will die fighting.

Will he ever put on a uniform and fight any of the wars he so desperately wants to start? Hell no. Will anyone in his family or friends? Hell no.

They love to start wars, not fight them. That's for the poor schmucks who don't know any better and sign up to run the fool's errands Kristol wants to send them on. On Thursday, we had Ben Barnes, the former Lt. Governor of Texas on our show talking about how he got all the rich kids of Texas out of the Vietnam War, including George W. Bush. There was something about hearing him say it that struck me. It isn't just theoretical; they really do get their kids out of war while they send poor kids to get ground up by the war machine. There is something infinitely sick about that. . ."

Flogging Congress

M. Kane Jeeves » The axis of weasels: "The axis of weasels
Filed under: Constructive Criticism — MrBogle @ 8:02 pm

Is this the worst Congress ever? Yes, it is. Think about what both houses are doing right now. The Middle East is exploding. Afghanistan is going down the tubes. Iraq is so far down the tubes, their recently-elected government is face to face with the Tidy Bowl Man. The deficit is soaring. People are losing jobs. The stock market is plummeting. Oil is grasping at the $80 per barrel mark. Violent crime is rising across America. So, what are they doing?

They’re coming down hard on flag burning, gay marriage and internet gambling.

Yes, they are. . ."

Yes, the mind reels...

Neo vs. Neo?

Think Progress: "Williams Confronts Kristol: ‘You Just Want War, War, War, And You Want Us In More War’ »

This morning on Fox News Sunday, William Kristol argued that the Bush administration’s “coddling” of Iran had “invited” the latest outbreak of violence, and that the United States should join in the current fighting. Juan Williams pushed back:

You just want war, war, war, and you want us in more war. You wanted us in Iraq. Now you want us in Iran. Now you want us to get into the Middle East. … You’re saying, why doesn’t the United States take this hard, unforgiving line? Well, the hard and unforgiving line has been, we don’t talk to anybody. We don’t talk to Hamas. We don’t talk to Hezbollah. We’re not going to talk to Iran. Where has it gotten us, Bill?

Kristol threw up his hands and didn’t answer. Watch it:"

Columnist Alfred E. Neuman


Novak on "Meet the Press" Claims He Didn't Out Plame: "NEW YORK Columnist Robert Novak, after submitting to a pair of interviews on his friendly home turf -- Fox News -- traveled to an away field on Sunday, appearing with Tim Russert on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' where he found himself on the hot seat at times.

There, among other things, he reversed course in his dispute with 'Newsday,' now saying that the paper did not not misquote him on a key point but rather that he misspoke. He continued to claim that he did not really 'out' covert CIA agent Valerie Plame. And he defended not only talking about sources with the prosecutor, but also refusing until now to confirm he had testified.

Yet, asked if he'd do it all again, he said he wasn't sure. But he clearly did not regret outing Plame, in fact, arguing, with little evidence, 'I don’t think I outed her. I think she was outed by Aldridge Aimes before. I don’t think she was a -- a covert operative. . .'"

Riiiiggghhhttt.

All The World's A Stage

The Blog | Arianna Huffington: Bush on the World Stage: While Events Heat Up, the President Hams it Up | The Huffington Post: ". . .Look, it's not that I don't appreciate the president's frat boy sense of humor. I like a chuckle as much as anyone. But given the tragic feel of recent events, his tone couldn't have been more false.

It's a very sinking feeling, watching this all-hat, no-cattle puppet who was put in power by the GOP elite back in a very different time, when all it thought we needed was a CEO to help manage the good times, suddenly finding himself presiding over a series of cataclysmic events.

Watching Bush meander around the world stage is like watching an amateurish production of Shakespeare. We need Olivier and all we've got is this community theater ham.

And he can't wait to slice it."

Sunday, July 16, 2006

The Creation of a Zealot

The Carpetbagger Report:

Have you ever wondered why Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family is such a nutcase? Why is he so obsessed with the sex lives of people he doesn't even know? Why does he hate gay people so much? Why does he claim to love Jesus so much, and then behave in a vicious manner so unlike Christ?

A recent profile of Dobson sheds some light on these questions. As it turns out, Dobson's parents physically and mentally abused him as a child, and he once got beaten up in school by a kid even Dobson admits was widely acknowledged to be a "sissy."

The article in a Denver magazine called "5280" makes Dobson's mother, Myrtle, sound like a real piece of work. Notes writer Eileen Welsome:

Myrtle Dobson was an amiable and social woman, but she didn't hesitate to whack her son with a shoe or belt when she felt it was required. Consequently, Dobson writes, he learned at an early age to stay out of striking distance when he back-talked to his mother. One day he made the mistake of mouthing off when she was only four feet away and heard a 16-pound girdle whistling through the air. "The intended blow caught me across the chest, followed by a multitude of straps and buckles wrapping themselves around my midsection." The girdle incident did not dampen his defiance, however. One evening, after Dobson's mother forbid him from going to a dance, the recalcitrant teenager told her that he was going anyway; she picked up the telephone and called her husband. "I need you," she said.

The article continues: "'What happened in the next few days shocked me down to my toes,' writes Dobson."

Years ago, on The Tonight Show With Johnny Carson, Carson had a long discussion with a Harvard Ph.D. who recounted a horrific childhood that included abuse, mutilation, and the compoundment of the man's various physical ailments. Their discussion focused on how he "made it" when so many in less horrific but similar circumstances ended up in prison. So Dobson had a tough childhood; well, welcome to the damn club. While his difficulties may explain his behavior, that does not excuse the behavior. No excuse will suffice for the inhumane positions that Dobson has espoused. Dobson and his kind would well to quit thumping the Bible so much and actually try reading it.

Saturday, July 15, 2006

Deficit Reduction Boogie

 
Earlier this week, the Republicans celebrated a reduction of the federal deficit to $296 billion (as opposed to the $400 billion projection in February) for the upcoming fiscal year. (ed. note: What a surprise. They botched an estimation. Business as usual in the Bush White House.) While members of the GOP did endzone dances in celebration of the fourth highest deficit — ever — there were some interesting developments this week with government spending on Bush’s misadventure in Iraq and the underworld of war profiteering.

On Not Being A Tool

 
". . .A new element of courage in journalism would be for editors and reporters to decide not to cover the President's statements when he -- or any public figure -- repeats essentially what he or she has said before. The Bush team also has brought forward another totally PR gimmick: The President stands before a background that highlights the key words of his daily message. This tactic serves only to reinforce that what's going on is public relations -- not governing. Journalistic courage should include the refusal to publish in a newspaper or carry on a TV or radio news show any statements made by the President or any other government official that are designed solely as a public relations tool, offering no new or valuable information to the public."

Kristol Goes Krazy

From Crooks & Liars:

"Bill Kristol writes his typical neocon column and says "It’s Our War," What’s happening in the Middle East right now is exactly what men like Kristol have dreamed about. Kristol has contributed to the chaos our world is in today and for anyone to take anything he says seriously having to do with issues of foreign policy have not witnessed what has happened in Iraq. 

William the Bloody:

The right response is renewed strength–in supporting the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan, in standing with Israel, and in pursuing regime change in Syria and Iran. For that matter, we might consider countering this act of Iranian aggression with a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. Why wait? Does anyone think a nuclear Iran can be contained? That the current regime will negotiate in good faith? It would be easier to act sooner rather than later. Yes, there would be repercussions–and they would be healthy ones, showing a strong America that has rejected further appeasement.

Healthy repercussions? What the hell is he talking about?"

Friday, July 14, 2006

On The Head Butt

The Blog | David Wallechinsky: The Head-Butt Felt 'Round the World | The Huffington Post:
". . .Fortunately, after days of ignoring Materazzi's remarks, FIFA has agreed to open a disciplinary hearing regarding what he said. Until then, here is FIFA's lesson for those hundreds of millions of children who watched the match and to whom Zidane apologized: You children should not head-butt your opponents and you should not pull their shirts, but if you want to call their mothers and sisters whores, that's alright."


So why did he head-butt Materazzi? Wouldn't a pop in the mouth have been more satisfying? (Remind me to post about soccer in America-- I am a fan.)

Here is a core tidbit from the above post that gets at soccer's difficulties in the U.S.:

"The flow of play was repeatedly halted so that the referees could punish shirt-pulling, hard bumping and kicking an opposing player's toe. Unfortunately, the referees' crackdown did not include the much-despised practice of diving (collapsing to the ground while pretending to have been fouled). At the last World Cup in 2002, the referees did punish diving, much to the delight of soccer fans the world over. This year, however, diving was rarely punished, and outraged fans fumed as this form of cheating proliferated. The BBC even compiled a montage of the World Cup dives of Portugal's Cristiano Ronaldo. Of course, FIFA did not even consider punishing players who verbally insult their opponents, a practice which is apparently considered nothing more than good clean fun."

US Ranks 150th on Jolly Index

Vanuatu is world's happiest country: study - Yahoo! News: "LONDON (AFP) - The tiny South Pacific Ocean archipelago of Vanuatu is the happiest country on Earth, according to a study published measuring people's wellbeing and their impact on the environment.
ADVERTISEMENT

Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica and Panama complete the top five in the Happy Planet Index, compiled by the British think-tank New Economics Foundation (NEF).

The index combines life satisfaction, life expectancy and environmental footprint -- the amount of land required to sustain the population and absorb its energy consumption.

Zimbabwe came bottom of the 178 countries ranked, below second-worst performer Swaziland, Burundi, the
Democratic Republic of Congo and Ukraine.

The Group of Eight industrial powers meet in Saint Petersburg this weekend but have not much to smile about, according to the index.

Italy came out best in 66th place, ahead of Germany (81), Japan (95), Britain (108), Canada (111), France (129), the United States (150) and Russia, in lowly 172nd place. . ."

That about says it all.

Major GOPer Busted For DUI

DenverPost.com - Pete Coors apologizes in drunk driving case: "Beer magnate and former Republican U.S. Senate candidate Pete Coors was arrested on a drunken-driving charge and is due to appear in court next week.

A Colorado State Patrol trooper pulled Coors over after he saw him run a stop sign around the corner from his home in Golden at 11:25 p.m. on May 28, according to Coors spokeswoman Kabira Hatland and the citations. . ."

At least he wasn't overtly looting the Treasury.

Senator Rooster Clucks

Rick Santorum Called "Rooster" Before His Days In The Senate... | The Huffington Post: "Rooster to the rescue?

On the name-calling scale, this doesn't come close to that red-faced guy in Glenside. But U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum's re-election campaign keeps calling Democratic opponent Bob Casey Jr.'Bobby.'

This diminutive nickname makes Casey sound inexperienced, lightweight and without the substance of his father, the late Gov. Bob Casey.

In other words, it's smart for Santorum to keep doing it.

The Casey camp could fight back by referring to the incumbent as 'Ricky,' but Clout has a better idea.

Santorum's high-school nickname was 'Rooster.' Why not have a staffer (where's Philly Press?) dress up as a rooster to attend Santorum's public events?"

Anyone who is surprised that Ricky's nickname was "Rooster" raise your hand.

Fire Over Voting Right

Firedoglake - Firedoglake weblog: "I have been watching the debate over the renewal of the Voting Rights Act on C-SPAN and to say it is a friggin’ bigot parade is an understatement. One white GOP cracker after another coming up and trying to parse attempts to gut the bill as common-sense measures of 'restraint.' Really, it is Jim Crow all over again

Everyone who goes nuts any time the word Diebold is mentioned should be screaming loud and long over this. The attempt to disenfranchise voters, particularly African American voters (consistently reliable Democrats) has had a long and ugly history within the Republican party and there are four really nasty wingnut amendments being debated. Steve Gilliard has more on Rep. Steve King (who is trying to disenfranchise non-English speaking voters like American Indians) and Tracy Russo covers the topic well at the DNC website. . ."

Read on, but prepare to be outraged (or at least irritated):

Pots and Black Kettles

Political parties clash over Iraq video - Yahoo! News: "WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Congressional Republicans attacked Democrats on Thursday for an Internet video featuring flag-draped coffins of U.S. casualties in Iraq, saying it 'crossed the line' by exploiting troops and politicizing the war.

Democrats questioned their outrage, noting Republicans have used images related to the September 11 attacks in their fund raising and White House political adviser Karl Rove has urged candidates to emphasize the Bush administration's record on security and the war.

The political spat was sparked by a Democratic House campaign committee video claiming "Things Have Taken a Turn for the Worse" that features images of the coffins, a makeshift grave in Iraq and the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

Republican lawmakers condemned the video as "revolting" and "disgusting," saying it insulted military families, politicized the war and should be removed from the Web site.

"For the Democrats, everything is about politics, so nothing they have done over the last three years to shamelessly politicize the war in Iraq has shocked me, but this crosses the line," said Rep. Tom Reynolds of New York, chairman of the House Republican campaign committee. . ."

Stealing For Jesus

Evangelist arrested on tax evasion | Local News | PensacolaNewsJournal.com: "A Pensacola evangelist was arrested Thursday and indicted in federal court on 58 charges that include income tax evasion, making threats against investigators and filing false complaints against Internal Revenue Service agents.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Miles Davis handed down the indictment against Kent Hovind, who operated a creationist theme park Dinosaur Adventure Land, off Old Palafox Road. . ."

...and not rendering to Caesar either!

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Fox Reports On Kos Flaming

MyDD :: Fox News Reports on Sub-Par Dailykos Flame War: ". . . .This is hysterical--in every sense of the word. Fox News is seriously dedicating time to a Dailykos flame war? Could they grow any more obsessed with the progressive netroots? I've been around since the very beginning, and I have seen all of the flame wars. As far as flame wars go, this ranks somewhere between the fight over no extended entries on front-page posts, and the fight over the Brown--Hackett Senate primary in Ohio. If you think this is a flame war, then your obsession with the progressive netroots is clearly new and you have really come late to the party. If our flame wars are news, why not rank them? Basically, I mean, if you really want to talk about flame wars, then why didn't touch the whole early 2003 Nader thing (#4 all time) the great 2005 pie-fight (#3 all time), the post-election kurfuffle over election fraud (#2 all time), or even the dreaded all-time flame war: SYFPH (Best. Flame. War. Ever.). But somehow the first major post-Yearly Kos flame war is news to Faux News. . ."

But then that does burn air time which they would otherwise have to use, you know, maybe like reporting, say, the news, like, say, the Middle East erupting in flames, corruption in Katrina contracting, nonsensical Senate votes on flags, gays, water buffalos and elves, blondes disappearing on tropical islands. . .

Censorship Fighting In Kentucky

The Blog | David Sirota: Lawmakers Take on Right-Wing Gov, Intro Landmark Anti-Internet Censorship Bill | The Huffington Post: "It's early morning down here at in Lexington, Kentucky and I just finished drafting remarks for a press conference I will be attending in Frankfort where state lawmakers will announce landmark legislation opposing Internet censorship, and fighting back against extreme right-wing Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R). Recently, Fletcher blocked state computer access to the Bluegrass Report, run by political strategist and Fletcher critic Mark Nickolas.

In response, Nickolas filed a federal lawsuit. Now, the Progressive States Network is helping lawmakers launch state legislation to address the situation - legislation that will be a national model to fight back against right-wing power grabs. . ."

Conservatives Demand Coulter Be Booted

Cedar Rapids Newspaper Drops Ann Coulter's Column: "Cedar Rapids Newspaper Drops Ann Coulter's Column

By Sarah Weber

Published: July 12, 2006 5:05 PM ET

NEW YORK Ann Coulter is no stranger to controversy, but her latest adventures have several newspapers questioning whether carrying her syndicated column is worth the trouble. The Shreveport (La.) Times is currently leaving the decision of whether or not to keep Coulter up to its readers. But the first newspaper to officially drop Coulter’s column since the latest uproar began seems to be The Gazette of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, where she had appeared for about 14 months. .
."

A Well-Earned Filleting

Alterman: Robert Novak, traitor - Altercation - MSNBC.com: "The upshot here appears to be that Novak lied to everyone in order to betray his country on behalf of Rove and company. First he revealed the name of an active CIA officer, blowing any and all operations with which she has ever been involved, costing the country millions, and possibly endangering lives despite the specific request from the agency that he not do so. That'’s all here. . ."

Read on for the entire crucifixion.

Enronians Dropping Like Flies

BBC NEWS | UK | Enron witness found dead in park: "body found in north-east London has been identified as that of a banker who was questioned by the FBI about the Enron fraud case.

Police said they were treating the death in Chingford of Neil Coulbeck, who worked for the Royal Bank of Scotland until 2004, as 'unexplained'. . ."

Insert conspiracy theory here.

Rummy Sez "No!"

The Huffington Post: "Rummy's Disease: The Delusions Are Highly Contagious

There was a time when Don Rumsfeld's surrealistic take on things was quaint and quirky -- chewy nuggets that could be appreciated, if not enjoyed, as the mental musings of a sui generis mind. But those days are long gone, buried beneath a cascade of body bags and on-going horrors. When asked during his surprise trip to Iraq when he thought the Iraqis would be ready to meet the security needs that would allow for the reduction of U.S. forces, Rumsfeld said, 'I don't talk deadlines' -- a snappy rejoinder we can add to the list of other Rummy don'ts: 'I don't do numbers.' 'I don't do predictions.' 'I don't do diplomacy.' 'I don't do quagmires.' Too bad for the rest of us that Rummy also doesn't do resignations. . ."

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Rewarding Torture

Andrew Sullivan | The Daily Dish: "Haynes, by all accounts, is a genial fellow who simply told the president what he wanted to hear. But no man who has endorsed waterboarding as an interrogation technique should be allowed near a federal bench. War criminals cannot be judges. The Senate must deny Haynes a 'reward' for following the law. If Hamdan hadn't forced his hand, torture would still be policy. You don't reward such criminals; you ostracize them and keep them for ever from public office. One further caveat: we still have no assurance that the CIA won't still be authorized to torture in secret sites beyond our purview. we know how deeply attached Cheney is to the torture policy. He may still be trying to find a way to get around the law, as he has so doggedly in the past. We have evefry reason to be thrilled this morning, but history cautions skepticism as well."

Hogs At Government Trough, Part 1

Think Progress » The Four Most Overpaid White House Staffers: "The Four Most Overpaid White House Staffers

Today the National Journal published a list of salaries for the 403 White House staffers. Here are the four most overpaid:

Deborah Nirmala Misir Ethics Advisor $114,688
Erica M. Dornburg Ethics Advisor $100,547
Stuart Baker Director for Lessons Learned $106,641
Melissa M. Carson Director of Fact Checking $46,500

And yes, there is a White House Director for Lessons Learned. We aren’t making this up."

B.O. Plays To Seniors

The Blog | Cenk Uygur: Why Bill O'Reilly is Irrelevant | The Huffington Post: "Here's a startling number. The average age of Bill O'Reilly's audience is 71. You didn't see that wrong -- 71 years old!

If you've been retired for several years, you're still several years younger than the average Bill O'Reilly viewer.

I don't have anything against old people, really old people, but it's hard to say that O'Reilly's audience is the future.
Half of them would be lucky to make it past the decade.

So, it turns out this big, bad, powerful O'Reilly is basically doing a show at a senior citizen's center. Are O'Reilly's viewers going to determine where this country is heading? We can't even tell where they're heading because they won't turn off their left blinker. . ."

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

My Wires, My Internet

DrewClark.com: ". . .Over the weekend of October 29-30, Business Week published an interview with Whitacre on its Web site. In the interview, which had taken place back in September, Whitacre displayed his usual aggressive style. Asked about Google, Microsoft, and Vonage —all big Internet companies that use broadband to transmit video, software, and telephone calls, —Whitacre said, "“They don't have any fiber out there. They don'’t have any wires. They don'’t have anything. They use my lines for free —and that i’s bull. For a Google or a Yahoo! or a Vonage or anybody to expect to use these pipes for free is nuts!"” For the first time, Whitacre was talking publicly about charging the Internet companies a fee to reach an SBC customer. And if Google or Yahoo didn'’t pay up, he implied, they would presumably find their Web sites more difficult to reach. Technology geeks immediately saw Whitacre'’s words as a threat. "“It certainly has the feel of extortion,"” said the TechDirt blog. "Be afraid. Be very afraid,"” said telecom consultant Kevin Werbach, a Clinton administration telecommunications official. . ."

Click here to read the background info-- wow, arrogance unlimited-- and erroneous conclusions. (The lines do not belong to you, sir! But that is a discussion for another time...)

Speaking of Jesus

Religion Taking A Left Turn?, Conservative Christians Watch Out: There's A Big Churchgoing Group Seeking Political Power - CBS News: "(CBS) At a church in Washington, hundreds of committed Christians met recently and tried to map out a strategy to get their values into the political debate.

But these are not the conservative Christian values which have been so influential lately. This is the religious left.

'Jesus called us to love our neighbor, love our enemy, care for the poor, care for the outcast, and that's really the moral core of where we think the nation ought to go,' Dr. Bob Edgar, General Secretary of the National Council of Churches told CBS News correspondent Russ Mitchell. . . "

Smearing 101

Following is a short excerpt from Taylor Marsh's yeoman work "The Swiftboating of John Murtha"; you owe it to yourself, especially if you are somewhat new to all this political stuff, to read through her piece. Click the Patriot Project link.

The Patriot Project: ". . .Once called one of the most hawkish members of Congress, Rep. John Murtha is now being presented as some anti war coward. His remarks about Haditha have unleashed just the latest salvo in the swiftboating strategy invented by conservatives, which they are now being forced to defend and explain.

Prior to 2005, The Cybercast News Service (CNS), purveyor of all things conservative and run by L. Brent Bozell III, had only one article about Rep. John Murtha. The headline was laudatory: Congressional Bill Would Establish Memorial for Victims of 9/11 (March 8, 2002). But on November 18, 2005, Bozell's team shot into action and hasn't stopped attacking Rep. Murtha since. . ."

Why We Blog

Crooks and Liars: "Duncan:

The funny thing is that for Lieberman supporters it is all about the war. –Oddly the wanker Chait seems to think this is about obtaining power - that supporting Lamont is some sort of power grab by the netroots, and he worries we’ll take over the Democratic party. It’s a weird view of things. I really don’t have much interest in being a kingmaker, and I’m too lazy to run much of anything. I do what I do because I actually give a shit about stuff, not to glorify myself (though just in case George S. is reading, I’m happy to be enriched.) Giving a shit seems to be alien to too many beltway pundits.


[John]I started blogging because I wanted my voice to be heard. I knew that if I introduced video into the blogosphere it would have an impact in some sort of way. I knew that seeing what people say is much more powerful than just reading the text. I do what I do because I care– which is why most of us do this blogging thing. And also Sauron told me to write this…"

[Me] Amen.

Monday, July 10, 2006

Justice Delayed

ABC News: Woman Accused of Witchcraft in 1706 Cleared: "Woman Accused of Witchcraft in 1706 ClearedWoman Accused of Witchcraft and Tried by Water 300 Years Ago Exonerated by Virginia's Governor


By SONJA BARISIC

VIRGINIA BEACH, Virginia Jul 10, 2006 (AP)� It took 300 years, but Virginia's only convicted witch has finally been pardoned.
State Gov. Timothy M. Kaine was asked to exonerate Grace Sherwood, who was tried by water and accused of using her powers to cause a woman to miscarry. On Monday, the 300th anniversary of Sherwood's 'ducking' trial, Kaine obliged.
'I am pleased to officially restore the good name of Grace Sherwood,' Kaine said in a letter that was read aloud by Virginia Beach Mayor Meyera Oberndorf before a local re-enactment of the ducking.

'With 300 years of hindsight, we all certainly can agree that trial by water is an injustice,' Kaine wrote. . ."

. . .about that waterboarding stuff. . .

Bad To The Bone

AMERICAblog: Because a great nation deserves the truth: "The GOP talking point: We're corrupt failures
by Joe in DC - 7/10/2006 08:53:00 AM

Not only has the GOP fostered the culture of corruption, they've overseen a failed legislative agenda:

The legislative year is littered with failed or stalled Republican priorities. Some, such as an immigration overhaul, repealing estate taxes and changing rules on lobbying in response to several ethics scandals, are disappointments for many in the GOP and for Bush.

For the most part, it's not a bad thing that their hate-filled agenda is failing. But corrupt failures is hardly a winning campaign strategy." [my bold]

When Doing Nothing Is Good Cover

Talking Points Memo: by Joshua Micah Marshall: ". . .Worse, for an Administration that has instinctively favored military action over diplomacy, the nation's military resources are depleted, bogged down, and largely unavailable for any further foreign adventures.

Yet we have stories emerging that suggest the current foreign policy dilemma is a deliberate course of action chosen by Bush. Time, in a mishmash of its news and style sections, calls it a 'strategic makeover' led by Condi Rice.

The fact is Bush has boxed himself in, frittering away lives and treasure, and leaving himself with few options. He deserves no more credit for a policy shift than the man serving a life sentence who declares that he will henceforth be law-abiding."

Lieberman Disquiet Explained

The Smirking Chimp: "Cenk Uygur, The Huffington Post

I am constantly amazed by how uninformed people are when their job is to inform others. Every press article or editorial I've seen on the Lieberman issue completely misses the point. We are not against Joe Lieberman because we are leftists who require ideological purity. We are against him because he aids and abets an out of control Republican Party.

I have been a centrist all my life and I was a Republican until five years ago. Lieberman doesn't offend my non-existent leftist ideology. So why would a centrist be so angry with a senator who claims to be a centrist and tries to find common ground between the two parties? Because the Republicans today are so far to the right that going over to their side is abandoning centrists in favor of siding with right wing zealots. . ."

From the Slamming Veterans Department

Respectful of Otters: ". . .Wente's got a column up in The Globe and Mail, a Canadian national newspaper, that's been attracting favorable commentary even from bloggers who are ordinarily thoughtful and intelligent. (The column is behind a subscribers-only link, but you can currently access it through Google here). In the column, she suggests that PTSD in soldiers and veterans (and especially in the Canadian forces) is exaggerated and overdiagnosed, and insinuates that servicemembers diagnosed with PTSD are either whiners ('War is hell. But life can be pretty rough, too. You don't need battle trauma to cope badly with it.') or goldbrickers out for an easy life on disability benefits ('some people will abuse the system if it is financially attractive'). Her claims demonstrate little acquaintance with the scientific literature on PTSD; instead, they are heavily based on arguments by an American psychiatrist named Sally Satel, who is affiliated with and funded by the ultra-conservative American Enterprise Institute. Satel's - and, by extension, Wente's - claims about PTSD are baseless. Let's look at them one at a time. . ."

Read on for a deconstruction of these nonsensical arguments.

Senator Rick's Enemy

Running Hard, Senate Power Seeks a New Image - New York Times: ". . .Leading pollsters agree on this: The race, so far, is mostly about Mr. Santorum. The Quinnipiac poll found that more than 40 percent of those who said they would vote for Mr. Casey said it was primarily a vote against Mr. Santorum. The senator 'appears to be his own worst enemy in his battle for re-election,' said Clay F. Richards, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, which conducted its survey June 13-19 with 1,076 Pennsylvania voters and a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points. . ."

Footnoting and Cribbing Update

Angry Bear: ". . .Ms. Coulter’s publisher answered the recent charges about alleged plagiarism with this:
We have reviewed the allegations of plagiarism surrounding Godless and found them to be as trivial and meritless as they are irresponsible. Any author is entitled to do what Ann Coulter has done in the three snippets cited: research and report facts. The number of words used by our author in these snippets is so minimal that there is no requirement for attribution. As an experienced author and attorney, Ms. Coulter knows when attribution is appropriate, as underscored by the nineteen pages of hundreds of endnotes contained in Godless.
Nineteen pages with hundreds of endnotes! I just hope Crown Publishing has done a better job of insuring the author is reporting facts."

Sunday, July 09, 2006

Quick Links

Religious Right Roundup and Summary ...Woodward, Bush, et. al. ..Ann Coulter's next column channeled by Ed Naha... flexible conservatives ... PFC Green... Star Jones gets sorta even... Colin Powel says "We're in a civil war" ...
 
Gotta go ride the tractor. I'll be back.

Missile Herrings

" July 8, 2006

The media flap over North Korea's test launches of missiles is another red herring tossed out by the Bush administration to distract the public from its disastrous policies, both foreign and economic.

As I keep pointing out, the intercontinental missiles armed with nuclear warheads that should be our concern are operational and sitting in silos and aboard submarines in Russia and China. Those countries have more than enough missiles – long ago tested, manufactured and deployed – to obliterate the U.S. Yet serious disarmament talks with these powers are not even on the Bush agenda.

No, the Bush administration chooses to make a public issue out of a nuclear missile program in its infancy that it knows darn well poses no threat to the U.S. In these Alzheimer's times, one has to keep reminding people that deterrence works, just as it worked against the Soviet Union's enormous stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. North Korea is so poor that it would take a lifetime for it to produce enough ICBMs to become a threat to the U.S.

And don't buy that nonsense that the U.S. considered shooting down the North Korean missile with its multibillion-dollar anti-missile system. The U.S. wouldn't dare try, because failure, which is the most likely outcome, would be unbearably embarrassing. . "

The Devil Has Disappeared

Progressive Daily Beacon Opinion Piece

Literally, it is Osama bin-Forgotten

A. Alexander, July 6th, 2006
 
"No really, it is literally Osama bin-Forgotten! Surely, George W. Bush and Republicans remember Osama bin-Laden. He was the guy who masterminded the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York City, the Pentagon, and another plane that crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. Yes, the guy that killed nearly 3,000 U.S. citizens. The guy that Bush said he wanted to capture "dead or alive". The guy Bush claimed was so super-duper dangerous that he may have developed a synergistic relationship with Iraq's Saddam Hussein and that country's non-existent WMD, which would then have led to a "smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud". For that reason and Hussein's potential love affair with the incredibly evil Osama bin-Laden, Bush invaded Iraq.
 
Osama bin-Laden was, according to Karl Rove, George W. Bush, and Republicans the reason the American people needed to reject John Kerry and vote for "Dubya". Osama bin-Laden was the reason the American people were supposed to "just say no" to Democrats in 2002 and 2004 and vote Republican. Osama bin-Laden was the reason the Bush administration kept changing colors from yellow to orange, back to yellow again - but hold on, bin-Laden is dangerous so let's jack the code back up to orange. Osama bin-Laden was the reason Bush needed to listen in on America's phone conversations, read their postal mail, browse their email, enter homes without warrants or warnings, observe financial records and, oh hell - the very reason why America needed the entire Patriot Act that included knowing what books people were reading at the Library. Matter of fact, Osama bin-Laden was Bush's entire reason for being. . ."
 
And now, like New Orleans, he's gone.

Nationalize Defense?

Public Good Should Trump War Profiteering



"In 1969 John Kenneth Galbraith penned a piece for the New York Times titled The Big Defense Firms Are Really Public Firms and Should be Nationalized arguing, among other things, that it was folly for defense contractors to claim that they were private corporations. Such claims made a mockery of free enterprise.

Nearly 40 years hence, Charlie Cray and Lee Drutman have resurrected and energized Galbraith's argument in their work titled Corporations and the Public Purpose: Restoring the Balance (Seattle Journal for Social Justice, Winter 2005). They make an exceptionally compelling case for putting the defense industrial base (DIB) into the direct service of the American public through a form of nationalization: federal chartering. . ."

Just Say No

"The Democrats must now say "We Do Not Concede" in the U.S. as it's being said in Mexico
by Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
July 7, 2006

Lopez Obrador is saying in Mexico what the Democratic Party should have been saying in the United States since November 2000: WE DO NOT CONCEDE. And no Democrat should ever again be nominated for any public office without first pledging to guarantee a full and thorough recount, as is being attempted in Mexico.

We do not yet know the final official outcome of the Mexican presidential election. We do know the vote casting and counting have been plagued with some of the same kinds of intimidation, theft, fraud and electronic manipulation that have become the staples of Rove-run elections here in the United States. . ."

Saturday, July 08, 2006

Crooks and Liars

Crooks and Liars: "In a wild development, Peter Hoekstra, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has come out big time against Bush and his secret programs:

In a sharply worded letter to President Bush in May, an important Congressional ally charged that the administration might have violated the law by failing to inform Congress of some secret intelligence programs and risked losing Republican support on national security matters.–

'I have learned of some alleged intelligence community activities about which our committee has not been briefed,' Mr. Hoesktra wrote. 'If these allegations are true, they may represent a breach of responsibility by the administration, a violation of the law, and, just as importantly, a direct affront to me and the members of this committee who have so ardently supported efforts to collect information on our enemies.' He added: 'The U.S. Congress simply should not have to play Twenty Questions to get the information that it deserves under our Constitution.. .'"

Friday, July 07, 2006

Sullivan Stands Here

Andrew Sullivan says: "I'm for balanced budgets, low taxes, cuts in entitlements, welfare reform, more military manpower, privately run healthcare, free speech, religious liberty, a stronger commitment to Iraq, and gun rights. I'm against affirmative action, federally-funded abortion and embryonic stem-cell research, protectionism, hate crime laws, the Medicare prescription drug program, pork barrel spending, torture, an untrammeled executive, and censoring anyone anywhere to appease Islamist extremists. And, according to Ponnuru, no "serious" conservative regards me as a conservative any more. What does that tell you?"

Tells me I'm fairly close to your positions, but there's nothing in there we couldn't negotiate about. So am I a-a- liberal?

Phone Jam Scam Slams Bush (Sorta)

AMERICAblog: Because a great nation deserves the truth: "NH Phone Jammer: The White House made me do it
by Joe in DC - 7/07/2006 03:48:00 PM

This scandal just keeps getting closer and closer to the White House political team which was run by Ken Mehlman. Via the Senate Majority Project:

According to a recent court filing, indicted phone jammer Shaun Hansen may offer an affirmative defense at his upcoming fall trial, arguing that the phone jamming scheme which his company carried out had the seal of approval of both the Republican National Committee and the White House.

Apparently, Hansen's defense strategy is not going to focus on whether or not he jammed Democratic phone lines on Election Day in 2002. Rather, his defense strategy will be to persuade a jury that he may have been persuaded not just that the phone jamming was legal, but that he would be carrying out the scheme on behalf of the United States government.

Unlike another defendant in this scandal, Mr. Hansen's legal expenses are not being paid by the RNC. But, seems like he is going to make them pay. . ."

Soldier Charged For Refusing Iraq

Iraq War Objector Charged, Soldier Who Refused To Go To Iraq Could Get 8 Years In Prison - CBS News: "

Lt. Watada is charged with conduct unbecoming an officer, missing movement and contempt toward officials.

(AP) An Army lieutenant who said he refused to deploy to Iraq because he believes the war there is illegal was charged Wednesday with three counts, including conduct unbecoming an officer.

According to calculations by military lawyers, 1st Lt. Ehren Watada, 28, could face nearly eight years in prison and a dishonorable discharge if convicted, said his attorney, Eric Seitz of Honolulu. Watada is charged with conduct unbecoming an officer, missing movement and contempt toward officials.

Watada, a member of the first Stryker Brigade Combat Team, refused to go to Iraq last month after researching the war. He said he would be willing to serve in Afghanistan . . ."

Marsh Reader On North Korea

Democrat Taylor Marsh Blogs Politics: "I know everyone is clamoring about North Korea, but I think TM readers have it right. Here's what reader John had to say:

Does anybody really believe that Kim Jong-Il would ever attack the U.S. with an ICBM? An ICBM with a glaring signature saying that it came from him, which would incur a massive retaliatory strike from us that would totally destroy North Korea? This guy is strange, but not that strange. He is enjoying his life very much with all the beautiful young Korean girls that he wants, all the western movies that he indulges in, and the adoration of his starving masses. Why would he want to commit suicide? The answer is he wouldn’t. He is posturing for negotiating points. He is not a Muslim ascetic longing for martyrdom. The same with Iran. Does anybody really think that Iran would send an ICBM at Israel, which would also kill Palestinians, Lebanese, and Jordanians, depending on how the prevailing winds took the fallout? The Israeli retaliatory strike, along with ours, would utterly destroy the country of Iran. Do you think that the Mullahs all want to commit suicide? They are enjoying their power and all the amenities that come with it. The threat is not an ICBM from Korea or Iran; it is the nuclear, biological, or chemical package in the odd container on a cargo ship coming into one of our unguarded ports. Or across the Canadian or Mexican border in a back pack or vehicle. Bush’s so-called ABM shield is a joke. It has never had a successful test. The only time it hit an incoming test missile is when they put a homing device on the missile, with no decoys to worry about. I’ll bet our missile defense teams breathed a big sigh of relief that they didn’t have to fire off one of Bush’s ABM’s at the N. Korean missile. What an embarrassment that would have been. If Bush would spend money on port, rail, and border security instead of wasting money on phony ABM systems that don’t work, we might feel a little more secure. Get rid of those tax cuts to the rich and we’ll have some funds to address our real security problems, to say nothing of our real domestic problems. - Reader John

First, let's understand that we got in the mess we're in with North Korea and Iran because the Republicans don't do national security STRATEGY. They do national security election CAMPAIGNS. They also react, usually incorrectly and in a knee jerk manner, but that's the way conservatives see foreign policy. It's a tool to power, not a way to negotiate in a global community. There is no long-term goal or thought processes at all, except to try and sell Star Wars yet again, never mind that it mimics the North Korean's flaccid launch. . ."

Mad Malkin Moment

The Horse's Mouth: "MALKIN SMEARS DEAD WOMAN, SAYS SHE'S A 'CORRUPTOCRAT.' SERIOUSLY.

You may have missed this story, but it's worth a look. It appears that Michelle Malkin is taking some heat from her compadres on the right because she failed to apologized after heaping a great deal of vitriol on a woman who subsequently committed suicide.

Well, now Malkin has lashed back at her critics. Her response? She smeared the dead woman again, calling her a 'corruptocrat.'

This is quite a tale. Here's what happened: Not long ago the news broke that some military recruiters fled a University of California Santa Cruz job fair after some protestors forced their way into the fair. Malkin immediately sprang into action. She wrote that 'UC Santa Cruz hates our troops,' described the school as 'seditious' and instructed her on-line army of pod people to direct their wrath at UC Santa Cruz Chancellor Denise Denton, even though it wasn't at all clear why she should be held responsible for the protests. Naturally, Malkin posted contact info so the pod people could more easily shriek and howl about what a traitor this Chancellor apparently was.

Well, on June 24, Denton, 46, went and jumped from the roof of one of the tallest buildings in San Francisco. The reasons are murky. . ."

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Crook Teaser

DownWithTyranny!: VANITY FAIR-- WHO WILL BE THE NEXT REPUBLICROOK TO FACE PRISON FOR BRIBERY? + CUNNINGHAM'S PSYCHIATRIST SHARES A LOOK AT HIS WARPED, CORRODED MIND:

". . .I'd say the new issue of a VANITY FAIR has a pretty explosive corruption article-- if you follow politics. It starts with a paragraph about right wing imprisoned Republicrook Randy 'Duke' Cunningham and how his case 'exposed a world of bribery, booze, and broads that reaches into the Pentagon, the C.I.A., and Congress' and then asks 'Who's Next?'

It's a long story and I'd suggest reading it (link is above). If you're too busy, let me summarize it for you. Despite the fact that the Abramoff scandal is just getting going, the U.S. Attorney's Office maintains that the Cunningham bribery case was historically 'unparalleled.' VANITY FAIR reminds us of 2 of the Republicrook bribers, Brent Wilkes and Mitchell Wade, neither of whom is in prison yet, and reiterates what DWT readers already know, that the 'brains' behind all this bribery and tens of millions of dollars more was not the simple-minded and pathetic Cunningham but the far more devious Jerry Lewis (R-CA). . ."

Link in above for some interesting reading on the neverending Republican corruption saga.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Osma No Longer A Priority?

The Raw Story | CIA closes down unit that was hunting Bin Laden:

"The terrorist tracking unit, known inside the spy agency as 'Alec station,' was disbanded late last year and its analysts reassigned to other offices within the CIA's Counterterrorist Center, the officials said.

The decision is a milestone of sorts for the agency, which created the unit before Osama bin Laden became a household name and bolstered its ranks after the Sept. 11 attacks, when President Bush pledged to bring bin Laden to justice 'dead or alive.'

The realignment reflects a view that al-Qaida is no longer as hierarchical as it once was, intelligence officials said, as well as growing concern about al-Qaida-inspired groups that have begun carrying out attacks independent of bin Laden and his top deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri. .."

Someone commented last year that if a Democrat were president, Fox News would have a ticker running listing the number of days he had been free-- "Osama Still Free After 888 days..." I guess with a Republican president it just doesn't matter if we bring to justice the man responsible for the murder of three thousand Americans.

Evil Leviticans Up North?

Crooks and Liars » The Stop the ACLU Coalition publishes Jewish family’s personal information: They are forced to move: "The Stop the ACLU Coalition publishes Jewish family’s personal information: They are forced to move
By: John Amato on Wednesday, July 5th, 2006 at 4:54 AM - PDT

Religious persecution masquerading as hatred against the ACLU. Jesus General finds this heartbreaking story about a Jewish family that is forced to move out of town because…they are Jewish.

A large Delaware school district promoted Christianity so aggressively that a Jewish family felt it necessary to move to Wilmington, two hours away, because they feared retaliation for filing a lawsuit. The complaint recounts a raucous crowd that applauded the board’s opening prayer and then, when sixth-grader Alexander Dobrich stood up to read a statement, yelled at him 'take your yarmulke off!' His statement, read by Samantha, confided 'I feel bad when kids in my class call me Jew boy.'

…A former board member suggested that Mona Dobrich might "disappear" like Madalyn Murray O’Hair, the atheist whose Supreme Court case resulted in ending organized school prayer. She disappeared in 1995 and her dismembered body was found six years later.The crowd booed an ACLU speaker and told her to "go back up north."
In the days after the meeting the community poured venom on the Dobriches. Callers to the local radio station said the family they should convert or leave the area. Someone called them and said the Ku Klux Klan was nearby.

Read JC’s email exchange with Nedd Kareiva who is pretty proud of himself. . ."

Ok, everyone, now pay attention: unless the Mason-Dixon has been moved since I last checked, Delaware is not part of the South, and I do believe it voted blue in the last election, so how did this happen? Maybe it does prove a point that I've been harping on constantly-- they're (and you know who "they" are) not all in the South.

The Sound of Many Shoes Dropping

ABC News: Italian spy master arrested over CIA kidnap:

"Jul 5, 2006 ROME (Reuters) - Police arrested a director of Italy's military intelligence agency on Wednesday on suspicion of helping the CIA in the alleged kidnapping of a terrorism suspect in Milan, judicial sources said.

It is the first Italian official has been linked to the 2003 abduction of Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, also known as Abu Omar. Nasr says he was flown to Egypt and tortured.
An Italian court has issued arrest warrants for 22 suspected U.S. agents over the abduction, but no Italians had been sought until now. . ."

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

Vets Talk Back

Operation Yellow Elephant has a terrific post of veterans responses to column about liberal lying and cowardice. Following is a sample.
 
"Active duty and retired combat veterans respond to a Yellow Elephant's column in the Rocky Mountain Collegian:

Another coward conservative, always ready with an excuse. Supporting our troops is "letting THEM do their job and praying for their safety..."
Give me a break. If Connie Rice had done HER JOB the president would have read the Augsut 9th PDB and Osama would be in jail and the World Trade Center Towers would still be standing.

Fred
Soldier
Iraq. . ."
 
Click here to read more. It is worth your time.

Carpetbagger Talks Philanthropy

"The downside of philanthropy
Posted 1:13 pm | Printer Friendly

Warren Buffett is poised, through tens of billions in charitable donations, to literally change the face of international philanthropy and relief efforts. The ability to ease suffering, combat disease, and reduce poverty received an unprecedented boost. It is, by any reasonable definition, a development to celebrate.

Naturally, everyone around the world is impressed and inspired by the generosity. Well, almost everyone. (thanks to slip kid no more for the tip)

Warren Buffett's new philanthropic alliance with fellow billionaire Bill Gates won widespread praise this week, but anti-abortion activists did not join in, instead assailing the two donors for their longtime support of Planned Parenthood and international birth-control programs.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to which Buffett has pledged the bulk of his $44-billion fortune, devotes the vast majority of its funding to combating disease and poverty in developing countries. Less than 1 percent has gone to Planned Parenthood over the years. And the Gates Foundation does not permit its gifts to Planned Parenthood to be used for abortion services.

"The merger of Gates and Buffett may spell doom for the families of the developing world," said the Rev. Thomas Euteneuer, a Roman Catholic priest who is president of Human Life International.

Referring to Josef Mengele, the infamous Nazi death camp doctor, Euteneuer said Buffett "will be known as the Dr. Mengele of philanthropy unless he repents."

It's not just some random priest. Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a powerhouse religious-right group, wrote a commentary this week blasting Buffett for funding clinical trials of RU-486 in 2000. "Since then, approximately 500,000 American babies have been killed with RU-486," Perkins wrote. "Buffett's billions have the potential to do damage like this on a global scale."

And Steven Mosher, head of the far-right Population Research Institute, said Buffett and Gates are dangerous. "Some of the wealthiest men in the world descend like avenging angels on the populations of the developing world," Mosher wrote this week. "They seek to decimate their numbers, to foist upon vulnerable people abortion, sterilization and contraception."

Is this where the right wants to go? Lashing out the most generous philanthropists the world has ever seen?"

I've asked several people, right, left, middle, what they think about this event, and the general response is abject confusion; perhaps, the puzzlement will mature into enlightenment.

Monday, July 03, 2006

That Crunching Sound You Hear...

"Bush Directed Cheney To Counter War Critic

By Murray Waas, National Journal
© National Journal Group Inc.
Monday, July 3, 2006

President Bush told the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case that he directed Vice President Dick Cheney to personally lead an effort to counter allegations made by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV that his administration had misrepresented intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq, according to people familiar with the president's statement.

Bush also told federal prosecutors during his June 24, 2004, interview in the Oval Office that he had directed Cheney, as part of that broader effort, to disclose highly classified intelligence information that would not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson, the sources said. . .

Bush also said during his interview with prosecutors that he had never directed anyone to disclose the identity of then-covert CIA officer Valerie Plame, Wilson's wife. Bush said he had no information that Cheney had disclosed Plame's identity or directed anyone else to do so. . ."
 
. . .is Cheney's bones breaking after Bush threw him under the bus. Here's the entire article.

College Gests More Expensive

From Crooks and Liars:

You may have heard that recently-adopted policies are going to make it harder for students with college loans. Apparently, over the weekend, it became official.

Students across the nation will have to pay thousands more in college loans beginning Saturday, according to a series of reports released [Friday] by the research arm of the Campaign for America’s Future. College students and graduates will be pushed deeper into debt as interest rates on Stafford loans — the basic student loan — rise from 5.3 percent to 7.14 percent on old loans and to 6.8 percent on new loans at the end of this week.

Parents that take out PLUS loans to help their children pay for an undergraduate education also face rising interest rates. This Saturday, rates on PLUS loans will increase from 6.1 percent to nearly 8 percent for existing loans and to 8.5 percent on new loans, costing the average parent nationally an extra $3,000 and $3,953 respectively.

It’s perfect timing, too, in light of the fact that tuition costs have increased 40% since Bush took office.

No wonder the president has been lying about student loans for months.

Guest Post by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report"

Do you really mean everything is not coming economic roses for everyone? Gasp!

Sunday, July 02, 2006

Bush Spying Before 9-1-1 ?

Pay attention. Listen-up. Argument undercut. Spin reversed. Sky falling. Bush lying...
 
 
'Bush reportedly decided to spy on your phone records BEFORE September 11
by John in DC - 7/02/2006 02:06:00 PM

This is important because, if true, it negates Bush's entire argument that the spying was needed to fight the war on terror. There was no war on terror before September 11, so why did Bush reportedly decide to start the process enabling him to illegally spy on Americans?
The U.S. National Security Agency asked AT&T Inc. to help it set up a domestic call monitoring site seven months before the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, lawyers claimed June 23 in court papers filed in New York federal court....

``The Bush Administration asserted this became necessary after 9/11,'' plaintiff's lawyer Carl Mayer said in a telephone interview. ``This undermines that assertion. . .''

More Swift

You can find a good link to Lt. Cmdr. Swift on Fox here and good post here

Science Key In MO Poll

From Think Progress:

"Missouri is generally a conservative state. In 2004, President Bush won by seven points (up from three in 2000), while Sen. Kit Bond (R) topped his opponent by 13.

But last week, President Bush flew into St. Louis to help raise funds for Missouri Sen. Jim Talent (R), one of Bush’s “most reliable allies on Capitol Hill,” but also “one of the most endangered” incumbents to Senate. Why is Talent in such dire straights?

Partly, Missourians are upset with President Bush and his rubber-stamp supporters in the Senate. (Bush’s approval rating in Missouri is down to 36 percent.) But more tellingly, “analysts believe Talent is being hurt by his opposition to a ballot measure to protect stem cell research from state restrictions,” called the Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative."

An election turning on science? Now there is truly an encouraging trend.

Saturday, July 01, 2006

Some Background on Lt. Commander Swift

David Goodman, writing about Swift in Amnesty Magazine, said, " For the first time since World War II a military defense lawyer -- a Navy lieutenant commander -- is suing the government in federal court over a case to which he has been assigned. The lawsuit names as defendants President George Bush and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, among others. It calls the military commissions proposed by Bush "an unprecedented, unconstitutional, and dangerously unchecked expansion of executive authority."

Lt. Commander Swift has received a great deal of press about the recent Hamdan decision. Following is some brief biographical data and some remarks by Swift in interviews with Amnesty Magazine and a home-town newspaper.

Most of the information in this post was taken from a long interview, not currently available on-line, in the Macon County News and Shopping Guide

Lt. Commander Charles Swift is the son o f Dr. and Mrs Lloyd Swift, now of Falls Church, VA . Swift is a 1979 graduate of Franklin High School (NC), Kiski School, the Naval Academy and Temple University.

Among the many questions in the interview, Swift answered that specifically the first question about the defense of Hamdan revolves around the war itself-- "is it a war?"

In 20004 in Amnesty Magazine, Swift said that one of the things that initially disturbed him about the case was that, bottom-line, "… I took a hard look at it, this was an administrative proceeding with less due process than what is afforded to someone who is about to lose their job. ...I was disturbed by it."

Swift insisted that there must rules. Rules distinguish between sides: "we're the good guys…we follow the rules." The creation of rules must follow a particular process, While allowing that the President may need some extraordinary powers for a short period time, Swift noted that the President needs the Congress to change the rules: ". . . it is not two days after 9/11. It's five years later. There is time for Congress to act…"

Swift was adamant about the separation of powers in the Constitution. "The executive power should not dispense justice." Noting that throughout history the evolution of justice hinged on the idea that "Courts dispense justice, not kings." Swift reiterated a notion that is oft-repeated: "no one is above the law"

In closing, Swift addressed the idea that the "bad guys" are entitled to a defense ; the principle is an old one that Swift elaborated on by referring to John Adams defending the Boston Massacre perpetrators. He shrugged off questions about his work interfering with his Navy career. Swift can retire in nine months; he has been passed over for promotion.

 

Hatch Hates The Judges

Orrin Hatch hates our American form of government

"by John in DC - 6/30/2006 02:40:00 PM

Speaking of the flag burning amendment, Republican Senator Orrin Hatch said the amendment would:

"restore the constitution to what it was before unelected jurists changed it five to four." He went on to say, "Five lawyers decided 48 states were wrong."

Those five unelected lawyers, who Hatch holds with so much contempt you can hear the venom dripping on his every word, those lawyers are commonly referred to as United States Supreme Court Justices. They are the highest jurists in all the land, and they are the governmental equal of Senator Hatch. He and they hold the same rank and power in our system of government.

So where does a United States Senator get off talking about justices of the Supreme Court as though they're two-bit thugs? This is the same kind of language Hatch's Republican colleagues have used repeatedly to paint the court as dangerous and even worthy of death, according to one Republican Senator and at least one religious right activist. It's what made Republican Justice Sandra Day O'Connor complain that such intemperate language could incite violence against Supreme Court justices.

Is this the way members of Congress should be talking about an entire branch of our government? About our entire system of checks and balances? Is this the best way to honor the framers of the Constitution, the founders of our country, on this upcoming 4th of July? Trashing the very system of government our men and women in Iraq are giving their lives for? And inciting violence against judges as a way of achieving political goals?

Orrin Hatch owes the Supreme Court, our soldiers, and all Americans an apology."

...and those judges are nearly all Republicans. Wonder what he'd have to say if they were Democrats?

New Polling Numbers

From Carl at Simply Left Behind

"I've got my hands on a survery conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research on behalf of Americans United For Change, of swing voters in swing districts in swing states. Some interesting information surfaces within. The survey focuses on independent voters: that is, voters who are truly registered as independent, or Democrats or Republicans who have demonstrated a willingness to vote for the other party. Some highlights of the survey:

» Swing voters are angry - 73 percent of these voters feel the country is off the right track, and 66% disapprove of the way George Bush is handling the Presidency (49% strongly disapprove). By a 2:1 margin, independents feel the economy stinks (in Ohio, it's nearly 4:1).

» Democrats come out far ahead in independent's eyes - In an attempt to winnow out party biases, in swing districts, voters were given choices between the incumbent and a presumed challenger (e.g. in Pennsylvania, voters were asked about Rick Santorum and Bob Casey Jr specifically). Democrats were preferred 45% to 28% over Republicans, with 25% undecided (in the aforementioned race, voters preferred Casey 53-31). It should be noted that, in 2004, these voters overwhelmingly chose Bush over Kerry. . ."

Much more interesting stuff here.

Help DeHyman The Airwaves

Say "No" To Sinclair

Help thwart possible plans for Sinclair to use the UPN/WB merger to spread more Hyman across the frequency spectrum. Click here for an easy, email petition.

Sullivan Talks Hamdan Decision

Andrew Sullivan on the The De-Throning of King George

"30 Jun 2006 12:31 pm

Absorbing the Hamdan decision today prompts the following thoughts. This is not an unprecedented moment in America's constitutional history. In war-time, presidents have over-reached before, and they will over-reach again. . .

There is also clear evidence that much of what this president attempted was not simply a good-faith attempt to protect American civilians. It was a deliberate attempt to expand executive authority, promoted by radical theorists of state power, and fomented by a cabal of dead-enders, bent on avenging Nixon. The intent of Rumsfeld, Cheney, Addington, Cambone, Yoo, and the other advocates of an untrammeled executive was the acquisition of unaccountable power. In wartime, such dangerous characters are even more of a threat, because they can use the cover of security to seize new prerogatives. By far the most disturbing aspect of those prerogatives was the power to torture. The ever-lasting stain on this president will be his abandonment of centuries of Anglo-Saxon prohibition of this evil. Eventually, when we discover the full extent of his torture program, we will be able to assess the profound damage he has done to his own country and the civilization which it defends. . .

Lastly, this is not over. The court decision was relatively close. If Roberts had not already endorsed a quasi-monarchy in a perpetual war, he would have voted with the dissenters. The Republican party, which has become an enemy, rather than a friend, of domestic liberty, cannot wait to place another proponent for an executive-on-steroids on the Supreme Court. When the next attack comes, the possibility exists for another, graver suspension of constitutional liberty. . "

Right Numbers Down

"Right Wing Blogs, Sites Down

Contact: David Rothstein of IPD Group, 202-318-8905 or Web: http://www.ipdgroup.com/feedback.php

WASHINGTON, June 29 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The following was issued today by U.S. Politics Today, published by the Washington, D.C.-based IPD Group:

An odd thing seems to have happened to mighty right-wing talking head media juggernaut. They are still talking, but fewer people seem to be listening -- at least on the Internet.

Alexa.com -- http://alexa.com -- which is owned and operated by Amazon.com, tracks online usage for all Web sites, large and small. At Alexa.com, you can check a site's activity up to the minute, or follow its trail back for many years.

At U.S. Politics Today, we thought it might be interesting to see how the right-wing media machine was doing. Not well, it turns out.

During the past three months, for instance, http://rushlimbaugh.com traffic ranking has declined 18 percent. He still huffs and puffs away daily on radio, but advertisers might want to double check the size of his audience. If the bottom has dropped out on him online, it likely has had a similar trend line with his radio show.

Even Fox News, that gold standard of right-wing media, is down 13 percent. Here are the numbers: http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&url=www.foxnews.com

Ann Coulter is coining money by attacking widows and orphans -- a new game for her since she's run out of Democrats, living and dead, to defame and verbally pillage. You would think with all of the attention the promotion of her new book has given her would raise visitor numbers at her Web site, http://anncoulter.com. [ sorry guys; no easy links to fascists from me] Nope. Traffic there is down 10 percent.

The audience chart reversal seems to be common across the entire right-wing side of the Internet viewing board. Billoreilly.com -- http://billoreilly.com -- has dropped 40 percent in the past three months. Townhall.com -- http://townhall.com -- that once popular center for right-wing news and commentary, has fallen by 24 percent. The Washington Times Web site is down by 27 percent. And Matt Drudge, once the hottest right-wing name in Internet sites? Alexa.com says http://drudgereport.com is down 21 percent.

Could it be that Internet users are getting tired of political sites in general? Maybe so. But http://moveon.org is up 13 percent in the same period. . ."

More on topic from Shakespeare's Sister:

"Focus on the Family down 18%. Free Republic down 19%. Hugh Hewitt down 21%. World Net Daily down 23%. Michelle Malkin down 30%. The Weekly Standard down 37%. Pajamas Media down 39%.

Raw Story up 6%. Center for American Progress up 12%. Crooks and Liars up 17%. Think Progress up 41%.

I’ve no doubt I’ve forgotten some notable examples that might be exceptions to this trend (although I will assure you I did not find a single right-wing blog whose traffic went up that I deliberately left out), and regular old blogs all seem to be down a bit. Eschaton is down 16%. Daily Kos is down 10%. Shakes is down 8%. But even there, the right-wing blogs look to be doing worse. Little Green Footballs down 19%. Volokh Conspiracy down 28%. Powerline down 33%.

Maybe it doesn’t mean anything. But maybe it does."

The decline in visits to some progressive sites might have something to do with there now being many more progressive sites and what is actually hot in the current news cycle. When Libby was hot, I bet firedoglake had more traffic than it does today simply because FDL was one of the go-to places for information on the intricacies of the Libby case. (FDL is still one of the best for legal analysis, by the way.) My traffic has increased dramatically, which looks good, but percentages don't tell the story. In my case, going from two to three readers represents a huge upturn but isn't even a blip on the overall blogosphere radar. And that's ok. I'm not doing this for money or fame but to try and change the world (big ambition, huh?), but I'd settle for changing one person's mind.